This is so unscholarly and anti-intellectual: a bunch of dudes talking to other dudes about a topic they know almost nothing about. Lolz.
That doesn't, no. Ppl keep thinking one experience/example/hoax claims to do that. No.
-
-
@GodDoesnt seemed to claim that his hoax did, or something very close to it. -
No, they didn't. This is just what it's easiest to refute. 1 test. 1 result.
-
Is that how scholarship works now? 'We have an N of 1. PUBLISH!!!!'
-
Is what how scholarship works? This is a twitter conversation.
-
@GodDoesnt's article certainly seemed to present itself as scholarship. It was certainly ABOUT scholarship. -
Hoax was aimed at scholarly publications. The denouement that it was satire was in Skeptic Magazine
-
By all means, think a different approach wld have been better & perhaps do it yourself.
-
The hoax was what it was & we can all talk about what it shows. Interesting how differently ppl read it.
- 7 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
The evidence is accumulative. We see so much awful stuff & nothing good yet.
-
Like God, it could exist but I'll need more evidence to believe in it.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.