Then your ethics are culturally relative & the principle 'stand for LGBT equality' doesn't really exist.
-
-
Replying to @HPluckrose
No, what it means is that that person is a lazy fuck and makes moral decisions based on literally no knowledge at all
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @fronxer
Not so much a lack of knowledge but a fear of imposing western values on non-western cultures & that this is a kind of colonialism.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
Replying to @fronxer
When its lack of knowledge, this is a completely different failing. I just realised I'd failed due to ignorance. 1/2
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose @fronxer
I just found out that caste discrimination happens commonly here.I hadn't advocated protection from it coz I didn't know it existed
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose
There is knowledge of existence of a situation and knowledge that enables you to comprehend a situation. I had the latter in mind.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @fronxer
I think the knowledge that counts there is knowledge of principles rather than culture.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose
Even those principles depend on language and concepts that label/explain/structure the physical/social world.The mapping can be non-obvious.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @fronxer
I don't know what that means. Either you think human rights abuses are wrong wherever they happen or you don't.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
The only time we cld justifiably support something like homosexuality being illegal in a culture wld be if every homosexual agreed
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.