Contexts aren't universal. In one its OK to kill gay ppl & in another it isn't. That is a fact. Moral relativity is upholding it.
I'm fairly sure that's not what I'm saying coz I don't know what it means.
-
-
Haha! Translating abstract concepts is challenging

-
What I was saying was that principles like 'women shld have equal rights' shld be universal. Situations can change it but this ...
-
...would also need 2 b consistent across cultures.When asking 'which women shldnt have equal rights' answer can't be 'Muslim ones'
-
It could be 'women who commit violent crime shld lose their right to freedom for a while' but this wild need to apply to men too
-
and in all cultures if our ethics on this are consistent. If they vary from culture to culture, this is cultural moral relativity.
-
Are you able to say that without relying on assumed-universal meanings of 'man' and 'woman'?

-
What do you mean? If you support equality for all ppl, you don't need to worry abt definitions of gender.
-
That would only become an issue if you felt one gender should have more rights than all the others or similar.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.