I think I disagree. Morality of actions depends on descriptions of them, which are typically context-dependent.
Are we at cross purposes? I'm not saying all cultures have the same moral values. I'm saying we shouldn't validate them all.
-
-
By cultural relativity, I mean saying things like 'Its wrong for a christian to discriminate against LGBTs but OK for a Muslim'
-
Cultural relativity is when your own ethics shift depending on who is doing something, not noticing different cultural values exist
-
Ok, *that* definition I can relate to more than the previous one.
-
That's always what I meant. If I was unclear, that's why we're at cross purposes.
-
"…ethics shift depending on" — I'm focusing on the "depending on" part, assuming consistent ethics, applied in a context-aware manner.
-
Well, I'm talking about inconsistent ethics. Culturally relative ones.
-
Are they inconsistent from an external perspective or are they explicitly considered inconsistent even by the person holding them?
-
Externally. The person may well be unaware of his own inconsistency & need to be shown they have double standards re culture.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.