I'm a personalist, I reject there is something called "individual" which you can separate from your family or society.
No, its not. If someone means 'lacking belief in God' by atheism and someone else 'claims to know God not to exist' they can still talk
-
-
but only by discussing the concepts of lack of knowledge and claim to knowledge, not by deliberately misunderstanding the other person.
-
I think misunderstanding is never deliberate. Misunderstanding arises from a communication problem (see Wittgenstein).
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I think that is already the wrong, superficial outlook of debate. More than a decade of New Atheism brought zero progression.
-
OK, that's a different point tho. This is an example of how people can talk past each other and not achieve anything.
-
It doesn't matter whether you think its worth discussing or not. Those people did and couldn't coz they refused to understand each other.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.