I RT'd it, though that was before I realized the pay-to-publish angle.
Apart from Taylor & Francis, Ebsco, ESCI & all the major sociological journals. Enough now. Arguments all been made.https://twitter.com/HPluckrose/status/867094526514438144 …
-
-
I like that you said "bored now," because it implies that you're a Buffy fan. :-) But with all due respect, that's a pretty poor argument.
-
Yes, you're hearing again and again - far more often than any of the other arguments you dredged up to respond to - that getting a hoax
-
paper accepted in a pay-for-play journal no one's ever heard of, which doesn't even pretend to be a gender studies journal, is unpersuasive.
-
That's because it's a true argument. I bet global warming denialists are also bored of hearing the same true rebuttals again and again.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.