"We made no attempt to find out what what 'post-structuralist discursive gender theory' actually means." https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/pure-phallacy-authors-wrote-hoax-gender-paper-to-show-up-academics-rcj3rp33b?shareToken=ef4f3170c43bb64cec8075a8eef4fe97 …")
-
-
still, they need to do a much better job at making the case they are trying to make. Nonsense published all the time if u look hard enough.
-
It was just one experiment to see what happened. Other ppl are arguing it's meant to show more than it does. It is what it is & it's funny.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I think http://www.salon.com/2017/05/22/why-the-conceptual-penis-hoax-was-a-bust-it-only-reveals-the-lack-of-skepticism-among-skeptics/ … is a pretty convincing take-down.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.