I wouldn't say 'a lot' to be honest. Non-intersectional libfems do still exist but I've only found 11 so far.
-
-
Replying to @HPluckrose
There's such brilliant work by the likes of Nussbaum, Okin, Anderson, J R Richards, Fricker, Langton, etc.. So much good stuff out there.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @SteveCooke
Still some dodgy views on gender identity, sex-work and an assumption that women are oppressed in the west in there.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose
Must one agree with an author's conclusions for their work to be good?
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @SteveCooke
Yes. The bad conclusions usually come from a faulty premise. You can reason beautifully from that but it will still come out wrong.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose
I guess we disagree then; there are loads of people I strongly disagree with but think they produce good arguments & important perspectives.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @SteveCooke
Or maybe we mean the same thing and are putting it differently. Do you mean you can strongly disagree with someone abt one thing and 1/2
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose
I'm quite sure about my premises & the conclusions that follow from them, but I'm not certain. Those other views help me form my views.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @SteveCooke
Sure. Not suggesting to stop listening. It's strongly disagreeing at the same time as thinking someone makes a good argument, I don't see.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose @SteveCooke
If they make a good argument, why wld u disagree? If it's better than yours. change your mind or leave the question open for further thought
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
I doubt you disagree with this which is why I suspect we're saying the same thing in different ways.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.