I'm not sure I have the answers to this, btw, but I do think there are more & less productive approaches & more & less noble motivations.
-
-
Replying to @HPluckrose
Always a tendency to be more angry with ppl supposedly sharing your values letting the side down than w ppl who never claimed to share them.
1 reply 0 retweets 5 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose
And this can be positive if its an attempt to get your own house in order. Setting your own house on fire is rarely productive tho.
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose
eg, if someone claims to value gender equality & then advocates sexist discrimination, this annoys me more than some1 who never did former.
1 reply 1 retweet 4 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose
With ppl who don't want gender equality, all we can do is try to ensure they only apply this to their own lives.
1 reply 0 retweets 8 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose
If they do claim to want equal rights, opportunities & freedoms & then act in a way that impedes this, much more argumentation needed.
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose
I still think that impartiality is the best strategy. Correct errors wherever you find it, clarify disagreements, irrespective ->
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @BristolBen @HPluckrose
of any coalitions formed against a greater foe ("Sides" are always coalitions, or else you're in a cult). Either coalition is strengthened,
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @BristolBen @HPluckrose
(if differences are overcome. This helps the cause), or it is destroyed (which means it was too brittle to survive attacks anyway).
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @BristolBen @HPluckrose
So we should argue against flawed understandings of equality as much as against avowed inequality. Both criticisms are equally useful.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.