funny that this convo never arises with respect to STEM publications. Just saying.
-
-
Because two reasons 1) STEM isn't abstract, it's quantifiable, and 2) gender studies BS is about pushing activism and agendas
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @thejolson @YeyoZa and
exactly. Goddammit! Read back already.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @cldm_ish @thejolson and
ok, stop now. If you are stem-real I'll read you. If not: go bark upon another tree.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @cldm_ish @thejolson and
Ps interesting. being genuine stem, but not believed because of my gender?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
I think the negative reaction was because your tweet made it seem like you were defending gender studies as equal to STEM
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @thejolson @cldm_ish and
May not have been the intended POV but that's how it got read
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @thejolson @YeyoZa and
as I said: will do science now again. Not good at social media sarcasm.
2 replies 0 retweets 3 likes
Sorry you've been another victim of Twitter's irony failure.pic.twitter.com/ujnmfxHSWo
-
-
Replying to @HPluckrose
:-) that's OK, allocating lots of H2020 millions: hard science is happy.
@thejolson@YeyoZa@RealPeerReview@KetanJ00 replies 0 retweets 2 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.