A humanities scholar rebuts criticisms of the “conceptual penis” paperhttps://whyevolutionistrue.wordpress.com/2017/05/21/a-humanities-scholar-rebuts-criticisms-of-the-conceptual-penis-paper/ …
-
-
Understanding how people thought & lived & providing evidence of this is not pseudoscience. Limitations of knowledge admitted
-
An evidence-based history is a science
-
In the etymological sense of the stem 'sci' pertaining to empirical knowledge.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Yes, but in that case you must describe that ideology/religion without any prejudice
-
Moralising is not encouraged!
-
History should be pure knowledge. Moral or ideological application is completely at odds with empirical history
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.