You see, volume of content for a parody account is not a mature, charitable or intelligent way of directing funding for research
-
-
Replying to @KetanJ0 @okayultra and
This is basically the crux of your problem: you've established a view about a field based on a process that isn't controlled or charitable.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @KetanJ0 @okayultra and
Oh come on! There is one
@realpeerreview mocking the bad stuff & thousands of outlets presenting it positively.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose @KetanJ0 and
There is no ethical problem with hosting essays coz you think they're good or bad or funny & saying so. I suspect u don't attack positive 1s
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose @KetanJ0 and
Individuals can and should go to a number of sources & evaluate different work & different assessments of it.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @HPluckrose @KetanJ0 and
If you want to a meta-analysis of a whole field of work according to criteria you have set, that would be enormously valuable.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @HPluckrose @KetanJ0 and
But don't expect everyone addressing a topic to do that. Ppl highlight good or bad work, test small hypotheses. It adds up to a big picture
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @HPluckrose @okayultra and
Without a method that accounts for bias an error, it's a picture that'll be blurred. I really don't get why that principle is discarded, now
4 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @KetanJ0 @okayultra and
You're being incredibly simplistic. If someone looks at one part of a picture with regard to one problem, this is part of a body of work.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
If you look at almost every essay hosted by RPR or anywhere else, they do this. Take an angle on a specific issue & test it.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.