Real Peer Review is the best response to claims we're exaggerating the problem. I'm only sorry, I couldn't link the lot!
-
-
What process are they using to select and cite? Is it a randomised sample? How are they assessing the validity of published content?
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
New Real Peer Review Retweeted New Real Peer Review
Feel free to assess the validity of this passagehttps://twitter.com/RealPeerReview/status/839882930646298624 …
New Real Peer Review added,
2 replies 8 retweets 13 likes -
Replying to @RealPeerReview @KetanJ0 and
New Real Peer Review Retweeted New Real Peer Review
And please assess the validity of this conclusionhttps://twitter.com/RealPeerReview/status/840945028553940993 …
New Real Peer Review added,
1 reply 1 retweet 3 likes -
I guess my question is what process you used to establish that they're representative of the field. I assume you did this?
4 replies 1 retweet 1 like -
Replying to @KetanJ0 @RealPeerReview and
I'm also curious as to what process you embarked when choosing which instances to cite on social media?
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
And I'm very glad it does. I feel very much alone when trying to write about women's history. Surrounded by the nonsense.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.