@HPluckrose good work Helen!
-
-
It's funny that a lot of people will claim that RPR is only criticising the abstracts - when they always read the whole paper first.
-
@RealPeerReview has a stomach of steel, then. We thank them for their tireless work.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
What process are they using to select and cite? Is it a randomised sample? How are they assessing the validity of published content?
-
You'd have to ask them but it looks like the criteria is 'Is this clearly completely nuts?'
-
Okay. So the existence of a non-zero number of nuts articles self-assessed by an anonymous account is sufficient hard evidence for you?
-
@okayultra isn't anonymous as far as I'm concerned. And do *try* to play the ball if you want me to take you seriously.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.