That's a bit of a slip from the original claim that getting it peer-review-published demonstrates something about the GS field.
-
-
Now, a few Twitter randos are sufficient to make that claim? Talk about anecdata.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @underverse @01Undaunted
You're also a Twitter rando. Look at the comments under some of the pieces about it. Furious debate going on by academics & non-academics.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose @01Undaunted
That's ... not how burden of proof works.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @underverse @01Undaunted
What do I need to prove? Have I made any claims about whether Cogent is reputable or not? Obv, I don't think it is.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose @01Undaunted
But the "success" of the hoax requires that Cogent have some repute among the community allegedly "exposed." Not only does it not, but 1/
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @underverse @01Undaunted
I'm researching it now. It's well indexed and Taylor and Francis are proud of it. It doesn't seem much different to the others.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose @01Undaunted
So it's of no consequence to you that it is universally denounced by academics?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @underverse @01Undaunted
Show me that it is. You keep making these claims. I'm going to research it properly. Not going on Twitter-users claims.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose @01Undaunted
"Prove to me that this scam journal no one had ever heard of until today is not actually central to a community I think poorly of."
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
No-one ever heard of it but they universally denounce it. I don't have time for this.
-
-
Replying to @HPluckrose @01Undaunted
Obviously those things happen in sequence. But good luck finding an actual positive association of some kind!
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.