Then why is it being painted as a Sokal-style indictment of the social sciences themselves?
I'm researching it now. It's well indexed and Taylor and Francis are proud of it. It doesn't seem much different to the others.
-
-
So it's of no consequence to you that it is universally denounced by academics?
-
Show me that it is. You keep making these claims. I'm going to research it properly. Not going on Twitter-users claims.
-
"Prove to me that this scam journal no one had ever heard of until today is not actually central to a community I think poorly of."
-
No-one ever heard of it but they universally denounce it. I don't have time for this.
-
Obviously those things happen in sequence. But good luck finding an actual positive association of some kind!
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.