What a crock of moronic, paranoiac, intellectually bankrupt, pseudo-intellectual drivel.https://twitter.com/HPluckrose/status/865687735692120064 …
You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
Cogent is a scam journal that no on in the GS field holds in repute or even *has heard of*. So just what has been hoaxed here?
Ask the people arguing that Cogent was right to take it because it makes an excellent argument even if the authors don't believe in it.
That's a bit of a slip from the original claim that getting it peer-review-published demonstrates something about the GS field.
Now, a few Twitter randos are sufficient to make that claim? Talk about anecdata.
You're also a Twitter rando. Look at the comments under some of the pieces about it. Furious debate going on by academics & non-academics.
That's ... not how burden of proof works.
What do I need to prove? Have I made any claims about whether Cogent is reputable or not? Obv, I don't think it is.
But the "success" of the hoax requires that Cogent have some repute among the community allegedly "exposed." Not only does it not, but 1/
The rationale hardly matters when they failed to get an actual gender studies journal to run the hoax paper, though!
Yes, of course.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.