What a crock of moronic, paranoiac, intellectually bankrupt, pseudo-intellectual drivel.https://twitter.com/HPluckrose/status/865687735692120064 …
You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
It just describes the peer-review process. You don't have to read it if you don't want to.
It's "peer review" in name only, and well-known as a predatory scam journal. Hoaxing it is like hoaxing a bot.
They were required to make changes. To make it even more nuts. And one of the two aims was to demonstrate the low quality of pay-to-publish
Then why is it being painted as a Sokal-style indictment of the social sciences themselves?
Have you read the rationale for it yet?
Cogent is a scam journal that no on in the GS field holds in repute or even *has heard of*. So just what has been hoaxed here?
Ask the people arguing that Cogent was right to take it because it makes an excellent argument even if the authors don't believe in it.
That's a bit of a slip from the original claim that getting it peer-review-published demonstrates something about the GS field.
Now, a few Twitter randos are sufficient to make that claim? Talk about anecdata.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.