Helen Pluckrose

Doesn't sound crazy to me

Then you'll probably be a social scientist.

I'm kinda kidding but tell me "plunder the earth, me-first, power power drill baby, lobby gov dudes w money, not my problem" is unrelated?

To penises? Yes, I'd say so.

to hyper masculinity, tied to insecurity, which, for hyper masculine men at the core of opposition to fixing Cc, could very well be their

Oh good grief.

If they had pulled off the hoax without the safety-net of the kernel truth in there, that would have been impressive.

This intentional nonsense survived peer review, published, and was reviewed as an "outstanding" piece of scholarship.

Reads like the ramblings of a Misandrist. I was hoping for something educational, not feminist insecurities hidden under climate change.

It's poorly written but the core idea, masculine ideology is a part of rapacious economic development, is a serious one. #fakehoax

There is no "core idea." The paper was deliberately written to be MEANINGLESS, but you're so far gone that you rationalize literal nonsense.

Read the passage above carefully and the "safety net" core idea obvious in the mess is that masculinity drives rapacious business conduct.

I'll see your Festinger and raise you the same. The passage you cite has an obvious coherent claim inside its mess, but you want it not to.

This is another Sokal hoax-like thing. And a darn good one. http://www.skeptic.com/reading_room/conceptual-penis-social-contruct-sokal-style-hoax-on-gender-studies/ …