Dunno. It's the Guardian. Very left-wing feminist
-
-
-
Replying to @TamaraBrouwer1 @HPluckrose
Maybe I've been duped too many times and this article just feels too absurd to be true... I'm projecting my not wanting it to be true.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @TamaraBrouwer1 @HPluckrose
I cannot find a scenario where the judge is justified, even according to his own (flawed) standard. If she is mentally ill ->
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
and thus irresponsible, then she is unfit to become a surgeon. But if it was deliberate and she is held responsible, then she is also unfit!
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @BristolBen @TamaraBrouwer1
Drugs & alcohol is a third option. Doesn't indicate mental illness or a naturally violent character. Still responsible for taking them tho.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @HPluckrose @TamaraBrouwer1
Still responsible, indeed. As for being a surgeon, only diff is that she has a propensity to drink/drug and then be violent, ->
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @BristolBen @TamaraBrouwer1
Not necessarily. I speak as someone who made very stupid choices re drink & drugs along with a load of other ppl doing the same thing. 1/2
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Most of whom are now responsible doctors, teachers, police officers etc. Stupid coz can't know what effects they'll have on you.
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose @TamaraBrouwer1
That's a good point. It doesn't alter my view of the judges decision, but it does temper my view on whether she could ever be a surgeon.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like
Yeah. Young ppl can do very stupid & harmful things, particularly men, without being mentally ill or prone to violent outbursts.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
