Yeah, except that isn't any normal woman's definition of feminism.
-
-
-
Replying to @albedobell
I wonder where this Big Feminist central planning meeting was? Jane Austin section of the Barnes and Noble?
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @JShellinsky
Yes, we could dream up a scenario that suits us.I'd bet
@HPluckrose would enjoy a sincere interest in her work. Try tweeting her.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @albedobell @HPluckrose
I get what she is saying, but that's not Feminism. It's a tangential subset being caricatured to indict the core. It's onomastically flawed
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @JShellinsky @albedobell
Really? I find nearly all UK & US feminists believe in a patriarchy here and a rape culture. Very much resistence to biological gender diffs
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose @albedobell
Feminism is about legal rights and equal protection. Its not about patriarchy, except when it's imposed. Jane Austen Jane Austen Jane Austen
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @JShellinsky @albedobell
You can say that and I have indicated that this is the definiton I too support. The other problems do exist & cripple the movement.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @HPluckrose @albedobell
Which is the definition 90% of women who call themselves feminists would subscribe to. It's right wing word hijacking. Why be a party to it?
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
I tried to hang on & tackle the problems from the inside but they are overwhelming. Most ppl seeking equality do it outside feminism now
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.