It's not a philosophical or ethical commitment to opposing any attempts to get anyone to agree that anything is true.
-
-
Replying to @HPluckrose @taf_tweets
If it were, yes, ppl who dislike religious evangelism shld also be opposed to attempts to convince doubters of global warming or evolution.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose
Atheists don't have proof of absence of God. We have pretty good evidence for both global warming & evolution. I don't understand your point
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @taf_tweets
The point is that ppl can feel positively about trying to convince others of things with evidence & negatively when its things without.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose @taf_tweets
But the dislike is not for the action of trying to convince others but for the arguments themselves.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
-
Replying to @HPluckrose
Doubting that I disagreed was kind of a double negative. I would have gone with being sure that I agree :)
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
Replying to @HPluckrose
Don't get me wrong. As a liberal theistic humanistic scientist, double negatives are my safe space ;)
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
They can't be helped at times. You need to express stuff.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.