But human existence&morality exist and can't easily be explained without resort to a higher intelligence. Metaphysics does not deny physics
-
-
-
This is silly and its getting embarrassing. I'm out now. Positing a higher intelligence doesn't explain anything & no evidence for it.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I don't mock and oversimplify your arguments. I merely point out that theories relating to the evolution of morality tend to be conjecture
-
I can only point you 2 books on the subject. If you choose not to read them, the evidence of the evolution of our frontal lobes still exists
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@sredniem@Norway_E@TamaraBrouwer1 Like Xtians who say the supernatural explanation 4 the empty tomb is the "most reasonable" 1 -
You conveniently fail to mention the number of people who claim to have seen the risen Christ and died horrible deaths rather than recant.
-
Read the letters of the apostles, study their lives and then tell me they were superstitious, ignorant or charlatans.
-
What's that have to do w ppl thinking a supernatural explanation is the "most" reasonable?
-
Nothing I have said would lead to the conclusion that I look first for a supernatural explanation of anything.
-
Science itself has very few explanations for how a universe with human life could exist w/o design. String theory and multiverse theory.
-
So? Saying 'science can't explain it, so God is more plausible' is an argument fr ignorance
- 5 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Now you are using logic akin to "We are social animals, ergo we evolved morality to help us survive as such"...
-
At least my argument was that a universe with human life is not a predictable result of random forces.
-
You posit evolutionary explanations for morality that can never be tested or verified.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.