Is this something a couple needs to talk abt along with whether the relationship is going to be open sexually & have agreed rules?
-
-
Replying to @HPluckrose
And can you actually do that? You could commit to not connecting various body-parts with other ppl but not connecting emotionally?
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose
i think it's not healthy to agree to constraints on emotional connection to other human beings
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @fronxer
And would the relationship survive & flourish? If your partner's soul-mate was someone else and not you?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
Replying to @fronxer @HPluckrose
my biggest constraints so far have been time constraints there is only so much time, and the people involved have needs
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
Replying to @HPluckrose
you can still declare relationships between some of them "partnerships" if the meaning of that is understood by each one of them
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @fronxer
Ah, a meaning of partnership which is not about an exclusive romantic commitment.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose
yes but i'm also saying that that definition is up to you(singular & plural)
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Of course but you might have to narrow terms occasionally to be sure you're talking about the same thing.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.