What matters is when 'gender' is used as the basis for some kind of rule or requirement & not as a subjective concept its OK to differ about
-
-
Replying to @HPluckrose
When discussing gender for political or legal reasons, you do need to define exactly what you're talking about. Get a motte & bailey thing.
1 reply 1 retweet 2 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose
Where someone says 'It's just social constructs like pink for girls & blue for boys' then 10 mins later including psychological differences.
1 reply 1 retweet 5 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose
My point is that whilst I understand ppl's frustration with the nebulous concept of gender, lets not throw the baby out with the bathwater.
1 reply 1 retweet 6 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose
It's not always biological sex we want to talk about. Sometimes it is personal & cultural concepts of masculinity & femininity.
1 reply 1 retweet 7 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose
And I completely agree that it's essential not to confuse the two & that people do this a lot for ideological reasons & it's a problem.
1 reply 1 retweet 5 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose
The author distinguishes between biology & feelings & I agree that's important but point out that both are vitally important to humans.
2 replies 1 retweet 3 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose
I think you make a logical error here. By separating feelings from biology, you resurrect the erroneous "Ghost in the Machine".
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @DeMondige @HPluckrose
Gender then becomes a sort of secular soul, something that is detached from our body and does all the thinking/feeling.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @DeMondige @HPluckrose
It's wrong: everything we think/feel is derived from firing neurons in our brain, determined by our brain structure & hormones.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.