Two of my friends are attracted to what they call 'feminine' men, the rest to what they call 'masculine' men. We know what each other mean.
-
-
Sometimes we want to discuss pure biological realities & sometimes feelings & perceptions.that we biological organisms really experience.
-
And yes, the fact that I research how people have understood femininity & womanhood & gender roles historically does underlie this.
-
Female biological characteristics haven't changed since 1300 but concepts of womanhood & femininity & gender roles have repeatedly.
-
Many consistencies remain & evo psych best tool for understanding this but it's the cultural & historical differences that interest me.
-
That interest me more. I argued for the importance of using evo psych so we can better tell what is historically & culturally contingent.
-
Here: https://areomagazine.com/2017/01/19/evolutionary-psychology-in-the-humanities-shakespeares-othello/ … I'm primarily interested in the different ways humans have made sense of things, particularly sex & gender.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I think you make a logical error here. By separating feelings from biology, you resurrect the erroneous "Ghost in the Machine".
-
I don't separate them. Without biology, we have no feelings.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.