Or I can cite someone else. What I can't do is respond to their facile opinion which my more considered & evidenced pre-prepared one.
-
-
Replying to @HPluckrose @BristolBen
Someone said feminism is just the aim for gender equality so I posted my meme thing refuting that. Disqualified coz citing myself.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose
Got it. That's the tactic. I maintain that should you ever get your hands of something peer-reviewed that replicates your points->
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @BristolBen @HPluckrose
then they'd be forced to respond or risk looking like idiots.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @BristolBen @HPluckrose
The question is: should we bother? It could be fun to amass so academic ammo and fire back.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @BristolBen
You won't find any. It simply wouldn't get published.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose
Point taken but there must be *some* academic institution somewhere that publishes rational critiques of feminism. No?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @BristolBen
Not that I've found, no. Not in the humanities.
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose @BristolBen
Were you looking for general "feminism bad" or more for "feminist concept/argument x bad" papers?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @VastScenario @BristolBen
Criticism of academic leftist PoMo feminism really that's not by radfems. A liberal humanist perspective.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
Closest I've got is some academics in evolutionary psychological literary theory who criticise cultural constructivism which is great.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.