They've managed to rationalise putting there fingers in their ears for anything other than an academic paper. At first glance, ->
-
-
Got it. That's the tactic. I maintain that should you ever get your hands of something peer-reviewed that replicates your points->
-
then they'd be forced to respond or risk looking like idiots.
-
Or I can just point out that I'm responding to their opinion with mine?
-
Perfectly rational But they'll just say that it's not just their opinion, it's academic fact, and go educate yourself!
-
That's when I have to opt out, yes.
-
Classic motte-and-bailey. Motte: "we're just advocating equal rights." Which wld be great. The bailey is huge amts of tendentious nonsense.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.

