My little meme things & longer essays are insufficient responses to someone tweeting their opinion because they're only my own opinion.
-
-
-
I think it must be a thing. A new thing to avoid any kind of disagreement or productive conversation.
-
They've managed to rationalise putting there fingers in their ears for anything other than an academic paper. At first glance, ->
-
it seems like an effective fortification. Only academic ammo can penetrate their armour. However, there is a downside.
-
I'm going to start asking them who they cite in their tweets & whether it's been peer-reviewed.
-
Responding kind is an option. It'll probably end in stalemate though.

-
Probably. I'll persevere for a while & then opt out if clearly dishonest. I'll put off assuming they are until the last minute.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Tell them everything you write is reviewed by the Duke of Gloucester. Can't get more Peer than that.

-
Maybe it's a Richard III joke.
#BardUponAvon
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
so demanding a higher standard of proof for the opposing argument, even though they make the claim. Right. Ok.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Seems legit
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I could kind of get it if the arguments regarded empirically falsifiable claims. I don't feel like feminist papers take that angle?
-
My views into that work could be wrong, but my impression is modern feminist papers have an extreme focus on subjectivity
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Facepalm.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
They're kind of beyond help if they think the ideology is sound and the movement is fine in its current form.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.