Exactly. Atheists are ignoring the arenas of science already dealing with cognitive barriers to learning.
-
-
-
When dealing w/ a cognitive status defiant 2 fact checks, other tactics warrant consideration. Strong arguments = backfire & strengthen them
-
I recommend three books for dealing with that in the essay, don't I?
-
i just found you and am delighted to meet someone who echos my sentiments. Hello !
- End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
How much was NA ever really a thing? Its inception passed me by, and when I heard about it, it seemed to mean "atheists against Islam".
-
That is how it's presented but that's coz that's what ppl objected to - inclusion of Islam in criticism. Main texts focused more on Xtianity
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
-
Yep, provided they like it!
-
I'm not worried.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I'm not sure it really ever existed. The term was coined as a derogatory term for atheists, iirc, and only some have self identified as it.
-
I say this at the beginning and also that the label should probably go.
-
Oh, cool. That makes sense.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
They could also expand their critical thinking to themselves. When i argue string theory is a fairy tale, my opponents fall apart.
-
String theory? What does that have to do with atheists? That will be a topic for physicists surely?
-
ST is unfalsifiable &has no evidence. The strawman argument reveals how debating atheists can mirror the dynamics of theists: irrational.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.