i don't think it's as symmetrical as you are presenting it i keep coming back to this thought and i'll need to flesh it out more at some pt
-
-
Replying to @fronxer
I'm not claiming its symmetrical. There are majority views & minority ones. Its harder for the minority ones.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @HPluckrose
there is majority/minority and there is power/control/ability to give access to resources
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @fronxer
Yes but do you think we can only oppose discrimination by making the majority pretend to hold views they don't?
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose @fronxer
I don't think we can. We can only say 'Believe what you want and say so but you mustn't discriminate.'
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @HPluckrose
i think "you mustn't discriminate" is an illusory goal to believe in discrimination can always find ways around laws
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @fronxer
Yes, it can, but we unless we can prove this, not much we can do. That's where we just try to make society more receptive.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose
that reminds me that i'm very weak on the "doing" part anyway. i think a lot about concepts/theory, not so much about how to affect change.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @fronxer
I'm exactly the same but I defend this on the grounds that change is effected above all by attitudes changing & if I can change some...
3 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @HPluckrose
(i am annoyed about my typo that you just sneakily corrected)
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Hahaha! I didn't actually notice but this annoys me too. I do not doubt that you know the diff between 'affect' and 'effect.' XD
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.