I don't think so. A Christian/Muslim who believes God made everyone's genitalia the gender they shld be is not abused by others saying no.
-
-
Replying to @HPluckrose
again i wonder whether the implied symmetry is valid, or whether positions have to be assessed concretely in a given social context.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @fronxer
I think that would be dangerous. It essentially comes down to a 'But I'm right so I can express my beliefs. You're wrong so you can't.'
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose @fronxer
Or we get bizarre situation where a marginalised group can express beliefs but not a dominant one & Muslims can be homophobic but not Xtians
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose
yes i agree that any number of odd constellations of rights and wrongs is conveivable in that direction but that doesn't rule it out for me
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @fronxer
I rule out any forcing of people to say certain things or not say certain things.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose
If you also rule out forcing people to listen to certain things, there would be a conflict again.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @fronxer @HPluckrose
where kne example of 'force' might be the inertia of an abusive majority
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @fronxer
How is inertia force? If someone is quietly believing there are only two genders & they're determined by genitalia, no-one forced to agree.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose
because it's inertia of masses. it is force that can only be seen as significant when looking at the bigger social picture.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
It's not force. You just have to deal with people believing different things to you and demand the right to disagree without censorship.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.