That would be beneficial for its own sake but it becomes more important when trying to draw moral lessons from history.
-
-
Obviously if a man was a bastard & happy to live with a miserable, cowed slave, his wife had very little recourse. Laws needed changing.
-
But mostly ppl had to get through lives which were hard and they had to do it together & they felt love & loyalty & commitment.
-
And this worked out with varying degrees of success & there was community justice & strong expectations of not being a complete arsehole.
-
In communities where everyone was very close together, indications that one spouse was not caring for the other wld bring strong disapproval
-
Thought: Maybe the "freedom" and lack of direct social contact creates new obsticals for people. A certain frustration. Like an open sea.
-
More options = less imperative to make marriage work. I still think that's better on the whole.
-
I'm not saying we should limit the freedom. I was thinking that not everybody is able to cope with this. Or at least not as well.
-
I agree. This is the argument for collectivism. Liberalism, individualism etc has a cost.
- 14 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.