It's even truer of Derrida. Much writing draws upon a few quotes from a small few essays, whereas he was a hugely prolific writer.
To what, exactly? If they're not representing them faithfully, will the problems go away?
-
-
It could change considerably the grounds for their legitimation. As when sources turn out to be forgeries/fakes.
-
This is far less important than which ideas caught on, how they were developed and how they are manifested now for my purposes.
-
But you are concerned to identify the key figures who have supplied the phenomenon you are describing. Don't get me wrong, I have a lot....
-
...of sympathy with what you say, and I hate much to do with postmodernism. But I see the phenomenon in broader terms, coming out of a ....
-
...complex range of enmeshed ideas. IMO, it is of central importance that this emerged during Reagan/Thatcher years. But there was a.....
-
You will never be wrong saying cultural phenomena come from a complex range of enmeshed ideas
-
No, but in this case it is vital to make more of other historical, political and economic factors.
-
When isn't it? Lets discuss everything relevant
- 7 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.