But I'm not so sure you can locate a single source in that way. And so many in that tradition have rarely read Lyotard properly.
-
-
Replying to @ianpacemain @HPluckrose
I did read somewhere (but haven't seen it confirmed) that Lyotard violently disowned that book. The bit so many miss is when he points....
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ianpacemain @HPluckrose
...out that when value disappears one still has price. Very much anticipating Marxist critiques of postmodernism.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ianpacemain
Of course. Marxism was one of his main targets. They were bound to respond.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose
That wasn't quite my point - in some ways Lyotard's book can be read as a scathing indictment of a condition from a neo-Marxist view
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
Replying to @HPluckrose
It's even truer of Derrida. Much writing draws upon a few quotes from a small few essays, whereas he was a hugely prolific writer.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ianpacemain
Always the case. I like his work on Augustine.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose @ianpacemain
It's always always true to say of nearly any theorist and any essay using their work 'but it's much more complex than this.'
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose
It can be interesting to ask many in the US who cannibalise Derrida, apparently, whether they have read him in French?
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
It doesn't seem particularly interesting to me. I'm more interested in what they do with it and how it affects society.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.