Thanks for clarifying. But I think that equating postmodernism only w/destructive relativism isn't really fair to some great & helpful work.https://twitter.com/hpluckrose/status/855783663904190464 …
-
-
Replying to @mecanuel
No, it wouldn't be. My response to this criticism.pic.twitter.com/EsvqvwiFQV
1 reply 1 retweet 1 like -
Replying to @HPluckrose @mecanuel
Derrida himself wrote (in Otobiographies) about how Nietzsche could not be completely dissociated from what others made of him.....
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
...The same applies to Derrida, Foucault and Lyotard. I actually think Derrida at best is a subtle and fascinating figure, but then....
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
..would ask how many of the pomos claiming his mantle have read him in any detail - or in French (which would be in keeping with his ideas)?
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
And for that matter, how many who cite him have deeper familiarity with Kant, Hegel, Nietzsche, Husserl, Heidegger, and many more?
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @ianpacemain @mecanuel
A common criticism of Derrida is that he doesn't seem to have acknowledged the existence of Wittgenstein!
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
But yes, the more politicised next generation did move past them mostly because they attempted to reconstruct society seriously.
1 reply 1 retweet 1 like -
Replying to @HPluckrose @mecanuel
One of the most devastating critiques I've read of Derrida is that in Richard Wolin's The Seduction of Unreason. On Derrida and the law.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
I've not read either of those, I must admit. I am not hugely interested in philosophy at all. More focused on how ideas affect culture.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.