But a different approach. They want to weaken the appeal of the 'other side' by making their own side more worthy of respect & support.
-
-
Replying to @HPluckrose
It's the difference between 'show them to be bad' and 'show ourselves to be good' as primary objective.
2 replies 2 retweets 5 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose
I admit to being in the latter category & not unbiased in weighing up these two approaches.
1 reply 1 retweet 4 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose
A day or two ago, I saw someone say to Matt Dillahunty (I think) that if he saw someone punching a Nazi, he wouldn't criticise them for it.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose
Because he wouldn't want to be thought sympathetic to the Nazi & the people whose rights you champion is revealing of your aims.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose
I have no intention of discussing the ethics of Nazi-punching any further. The arguments have all been made & if still not getting it...
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose
But the thinking & motivations which underlie the conflict on this & so many other similar examples is particularly interesting.
1 reply 1 retweet 4 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose
A fatal disconnect. I cldn't have disagreed more with that person coz I think strengthening your own position is the most important thing.
1 reply 0 retweets 5 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose
Not in an 'insisting of absolute ideological purity' way but in addressing where reasonable, ethical people's confidence in you cld be lost.
2 replies 0 retweets 6 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose
Temperamentally, I'm an own-sider. Even though intellectually I agree with you. I'm working on this tribalist tendency of mine...
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
I think temperamentally we all are.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.