There's a fundamental flaw here & I think it comes down to two different ways of approaching the same problem with the same goals.
-
-
Not in an 'insisting of absolute ideological purity' way but in addressing where reasonable, ethical people's confidence in you cld be lost.
-
I don't think it's enough to show the other side to be bad (especially if you're doing so dishonestly).Need to show your own side to be good
-
This might be due to my allegedly naive perception that most people want to be reasonable & ethical & to support what seems fair & right.
-
I think nearly everyone already knows that Nazism & fascism are morally wrong and most people know that sexism, racism & homophobia etc are
-
Therefore, more important to talk about best ways to tackle these than keep saying they are wrong (especially if you use the terms lightly)
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.