Those arguments can be convincing because based on something. They can be wrong. If they can't be, its pseudoscience. Else, science.
My problem with PoMo is that it tries to make 'how people think & feel abt things' into 'multiple truths about things.' No. Stop it.
-
-
Which is why I insist on falsification.
-
For truth claims. Yes. I agree with you there.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.