Then people will be able to search and find how commonly things were being talked about. Much more data at our fingertips.
I wonder if this is a gendered thing? You are goal-focused -what is true - and I am more interested in understanding how people think.
-
-
We see this in conversation. Men more likely to focus on information exchange, women more likely to explore how everybody feels abt things.
-
My problem with PoMo is that it tries to make 'how people think & feel abt things' into 'multiple truths about things.' No. Stop it.
-
Which is why I insist on falsification.
-
For truth claims. Yes. I agree with you there.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
You mind find this interesting in that context http://quillette.com/2017/04/17/rhetorical-trap-heart-neurosexism-debate/ …
-
Yes, that's a good piece.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Maybe, I just think that 'how people think' is not beyond the bounds of science in principle.
-
Well no, this is why I argue for the inclusion of evolutionary psychology & neuroscience in literary theory
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.