There's not a rigid boundary between culture & science coz science is part of culture.But we don't always have to look at science culturallyhttps://twitter.com/JCMaas/status/854304208694194176 …
These can certainly be measured scientifically but this, to me,is less interesting than trying to understand how it all works in ppl's minds
-
-
This is mostly about definitions, but I pers. don't see why that shouldn't be called science. If your ideas are falsifiable, it's science.
-
They're not falsifiable & making them so is not the point. One of my professors & her husband is making a database of phrases in manuscripts
-
Then people will be able to search and find how commonly things were being talked about. Much more data at our fingertips.
-
That's science. I'm more interested in pulling out attitudes and making convincing arguments about their influences & significance.
-
eg The thesis I won an award for compared Aemilia Lanyer's model of feminine spiritual wisdom with that attributed to St Monica of Hippo.
-
People were interested in the connections & similarities right down to the language. Did she base this on Monica or was it just in the air?
-
I do not know but made some arguments that either or both are plausible. So, not very scientific but of interest to like-minded people.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.