There's not a rigid boundary between culture & science coz science is part of culture.But we don't always have to look at science culturallyhttps://twitter.com/JCMaas/status/854304208694194176 …
-
-
It's sometimes necessary to mention that humans are apes but if I write an essay abt cultural issues w/out mentioning this, that's OK too.
-
No scientist DMs me demanding an explanation. But too often ppl in the humanities feel entitled to demand science always addresses culture
-
IMHO this is because people are confused about what science is.
-
We can mean different things - an institution, a focus of study, a method etc. Just need to clarify which sense we're using it in.
-
I'm talking about method mainly here.
-
I'm thinking mostly about focus of study. Looking at the way ppl think culturally & the way they think scientifically is very different.
-
I'm certainly interested in cognitive mechanisms underlying it but I'm more interested in language & attitudes & ideology affecting culture.
-
These can certainly be measured scientifically but this, to me,is less interesting than trying to understand how it all works in ppl's minds
- 7 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
They are just subjects that can be questioned methodically.
-
What are?
-
Culture and nature. Differences in their study are mostly because of variety of scale and different historical institutional development.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.