I don't know what they hope to get out of it. You differ in your perceptions of gender. Neither of you is motivated by hatred of women.
-
-
-
I realise this difference might be insurmountable but don't know what either hopes to gain by attacking values the other doesn't have.
-
You don't have to think someone is right in what they are saying to acknowledge what they are saying. What's to be gained from not doing so?
-
Trans-inclusive feminists do a bit better in at least acknowledging the radfems exclude trans women but attribute it to mindless hatred...
-
...rather than a logical consequence of believing gender not to exist & a paranoid premise that everything is a patriarchal conspiracy.
-
The radfem insistence on referring to only themselves as feminists &often insisting transactivists are MRAs attacking feminists is just nuts
-
So you get 'Feminists oppose the trans delusion coz...' ignoring fact that the main supporters of trans acceptance are, in fact, feminists.
-
From the outside, it looks like a gender version of the war over whether or not the bread & wine is really the body & blood of Christ'
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Because it undermines the whole cause?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
It reminds me a lot of the battle for ideologic purity in the U.S.S.R. "You are a social traitor ! No ! You are a social traitor !"
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Give them both a mirror and a ball gag! They'd probably explode!!!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.