For example, there are good arguments for regarding the care/harm foundation as more important ethically than sanctity/degradation one.
Not necessarily. I can understand the moral foundations &conservatives to work on more of them w/out thinking it's better ethically to do sohttps://twitter.com/TheWhig/status/852550957120577536 …
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
No. Not "not necessarily." It's a proven phenomenon. The question is why? The book answers that question scientifically.
New conversation -
-
-
Empirically, Social constructs that accept human nature as it is do more for the greater good than those that try to create the "new man"
-
I suspect it does. However, its unclear that conservatives do this more. So many are religious & have bizarre ideas about human nature.
-
Religion, ideology, and morality are just different names for the same underlying aspect of human nature.https://theindependentwhig.com/2013/06/11/religion-morality-and-ideology-different-names-for-the-same-underlying-element-of-human-nature/ …
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.