But those two things are only really equivalent if a woman can sign a piece of paper & no longer be pregnant. If that's what an abortion was
In principal, we could say that both sexes should have the right to have foetuses removed from their bodies & the right to sign a piece...
-
-
...of paper & then have their foetus come to term in someone else's body and never have to have anything more to do with it.
-
But the reality is different because men & women's bodies are different.
-
no ofc what i mean is men who dont want a baby should be able to waive rights to it and all responsibilities go to obviously it
-
Of course, they can do this without ending the life of the embryo so the decision is a very different one ethically & emotionally.
-
It could be an option for pro-life men as well as pro-choice ones.
-
so why dont we push for this when we push for abortion
-
These are different topics. One is whether we can end the life of an embryo. The other is whether we can decline to pay for a child.
-
You can believe that both should be rights but not that they're addressing the same thing. Ethics completely different.
- 5 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.