@UncutBits Not for the baby!
-
-
Its exactly as safe for the 'baby' as abstinence is.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
False equivalence. There is no baby (or possibility of a baby) with abstinence. Pity this option isn't chosen more often.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Then concern is not for the potential person? OK they never get to exist thru abstinence but wrong if thru abortion?' Exactly same to them
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
At the cost of a healthy sex-life & accompanying relationships. Rather a sad & limiting choice, no? Unless it suits the individual.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
When adults of a sexually-reproducing species are attracted to each other, they want to have relationships & intersect their body-parts.
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose @CordovanSplotch and
These drives - both the emotional & physical - are completely normal & healthy in homo sapiens & much enrich our experience of life.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
But relationships, romantic love, sex are healthy & wise! Good for the mental health, wellbeing & emotional fulfillment.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.