I don't feel familiar enough with Saudi culture to argue my point in that specific context. But have you seen this? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5eqYEVYZgdo …
She had no right to her own money or to own a business tho women did run businesses in husband's name.
-
-
She doesn't explain how she managed this suggesting she didn't need to. It would not have caused surprise but why wouldn't it?
-
Best hypothesis - her father very influential, powerful man, left her money & informal agreement with husband that it was hers.
-
Can't have been legally binding but the status of the Brunham family (hers) so much above the Kempes that it cld have been as good as.
-
We get little snapshots like that which contradict laws & records that we know & have to try to piece it all together.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.