Alternative is not allowing half population rights & opportunities. Unless there can be non-gendered system where only half population work?
-
-
But I take your point, you are (substantively) still talking about allowing the denial of opportunity to 54% of folks
-
Not opportunity but if many ppl feel burdened by having to work, cldn't workforce be reduced by choice?
-
Sure, but that's going to require some proper left-wing politics that a lot of middle-class folk ain't going to like
-
Not really suggesting a specific action. Talking abt hypothetically if situation felt to be worse coz more have to work for less...
-
...problem is not actually women working but more people working. If numbers had stayed same but not been gendered, cld be ideal scenario.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
This really needs more than 140 characters.
-
Probably.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Which I, from the biased position of someone working with impoverished people every day, see as a greater evil.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
But by enforcing a rapid change to the status quo, you have effectively cut real income growth, leaving many folk in poverty.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Could have, arguably, facilitated the introduction of women to the workforce without the dumping effect created by legislative change.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
[speaking of the UK] There was limited any legal obstruction to women working; merely societal. A more gradual social change
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.