She had a thing on HBR where she talkes about Saudi being gynocentric...said something like the women cant drive so men have to for them
-
-
Replying to @JDefiant9 @melliflora and
I think her position is probably less radical than her critics made it out to be but it definitely seemed like her most questionable take.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
According to Straughan, a majority of Saudi women polled agree with the status quo regarding driving. If true, her analysis makes sense.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Not if it suggests that its fine that women who want autonomy & rights can't have them because more women don't want them.
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose @melliflora and
In same way, men should have same rights as women even if majority don't want to use them.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
"Rights" are part of a larger picture, though. Gaining rights a majority doesn't want can mean losing privileges that majority does want.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Good. If a woman wants to stay indoors, never drive, never make her own decisions, she needs to find a man happy to complement this.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
In the larger picture, though, men's "happiness to complement this" isn't an issue. It is an *obligation* with the coercive force of law.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
We were talking abt getting rid of that system & women losing that 'privilege.' I said she can still have it if man happy to oblige.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
The one we have now is pretty good.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.