It'd be easier if you just watched it than for me to try to explain via twitter. Radical ideas and concision don't mix well, unfortunately.
-
-
Replying to @melliflora
I'm not going to watch a 30 minute MRA video on whether women were historically oppressed. I have studied this in a bit more depth for yrs.
4 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose
I've never heard an analysis like the one in Karen Straughan's video anywhere else. And, I think it's likelier than not that you haven't.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @melliflora
I suspect I have. She outlined it to me over the course of a couple of hours.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose
The fact that you used the word "oppression" in your dismissal of a quote of hers makes me question how well you understand her position.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @melliflora
I know she doesn't think oppression applies. I know she thinks there are different duties and privileges & it works in a complementary way.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose @melliflora
But this is completely irrelevant to my view on women's rights in history which I happen to know something about.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose
Well, Helen, I do hope you can find the time to watch her video. I'd enjoy discussing it with you, knowing we were both on the same page.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @melliflora
Maybe I will in the future. I am more focused on a universal liberalism right now. Sick of feminist & MRA propaganda.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose
With all due respect, Helen, I don't think Straughan's video is "propaganda." It is radical gender theory from an incisive, original mind.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
OK. I am not interested in gender theory.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.